Sourced on both sides, or not in the table
A row appears only if both columns trace to something published. That rules out the row where a competitor’s column reads “No” because the author could not find the feature.

Comparisons
Every comparison here names the version it was written against, cites the other project’s own pages, and carries a section on where that editor is the better choice. If a page cannot do all three, it is not published.
Method
These exist because the easy version of a comparison page is dishonest in ways that are hard to see from the outside — and because a page written carelessly is wrong within a month rather than within a year.
A row appears only if both columns trace to something published. That rules out the row where a competitor’s column reads “No” because the author could not find the feature.
Linelark’s own capabilities are described as things it does, not as things the other editor lacks — because almost nobody publishes a list of what their software cannot do.
A feature on its way is recorded as upcoming. CotEditor’s folder search is exactly this case: writing it up as a gap would have been wrong within weeks of shipping.
Not a token paragraph at the bottom. If one of the listed strengths is what you need, the honest recommendation is the other editor, and the page says so in those words.
It is the comparison most people actually want and the one that takes the most care to write fairly — debugging, language servers, deep git tooling and an extension marketplace are all things Linelark has no answer to. It will be added when it can be written to the four rules above rather than quickly.
Free, and staying free
Nothing here is a trial and there is no licence to buy, so the comparison that matters is the one you run on your own files.
Choose a release 6.5 MB · macOS 14+ · versioned checksums on the download page