A file browser
with a terminal.

Finder++ browses files the way a Mac app should — four views, a sidebar, Quick Look, tags, the contextual menu you already know. Then it opens a real shell, Claude Code, or Codex in whatever folder is on screen, without you typing the path again. It is an early beta, and this page says where that shows.

Get the beta What beta means here

Linelark Finder++ browsing a project folder, with a shell open in that folder below the file list and Claude Code running in a panel on the right.

The path you already
have open.

Every terminal session I start begins the same way: find the folder, copy the path, change directory, start over. The folder was already open in front of me. The window that knew where I was had no way to act on it, and the window that could act on it had no idea where I was.

Finder++ closes that gap. It is a native file browser first — AppKit views, system icons, the Quick Look and Tags the rest of the Mac uses — and the terminal, Claude Code and Codex panels open in the directory the browser is showing. Change folder, restart a panel, and it is there.

It is a separate app from Linelark Notepad, downloaded separately, and installing it changes nothing about the editor. It is here because it is built by the same person, on the same principles, and because the people who wanted a terminal that follows the file are the people most likely to want this.

Read the principles behind both apps

What it does today.

Read off the shipping build rather than a roadmap. Everything below is in the beta you can download.

Four views

Icons, List, Columns and Gallery, switched from the toolbar. Folders sort first, then names, the way the system sorts them.

A terminal in the folder

A shell panel opens below the file list, already in the directory on screen, using the login shell you already use. The View menu toggles it, or the shortcut in the next section.

Claude and Codex, docked

A right-hand dock runs the claude and codex commands already installed on your Mac, each in the same folder, each restartable on its own.

The menu you expect

Open With, Quick Look, Compress, Duplicate, Make Alias, Tags, Share, Get Info, Rename and Move to Trash, from the contextual menu.

Favorites you arrange

Drag any folder into the sidebar, reorder it, rename what it is called. The list persists between launches.

Moves that refuse to overwrite

Control-X marks files, Control-V moves them. An existing name at the destination is never replaced — that item stays pending instead.

Hands stay put.

Standard Mac shortcuts where the Mac has one, and a Windows-style file cut where it does not.

Space
Quick Look the selection
⇧⌘N
New folder
Return
Rename
⌘D
Duplicate
⌘⌫
Move to Trash
⇧⌘G
Go to folder
⌘[ ⌘]
Back and forward
⌃X ⌃V
Cut files, move them here
⌥⌘V
Move item here
⌘B
Toggle the sidebar
⌃`
Toggle the terminal
⌘R
Refresh the folder

What “beta” means
on this page.

Not a disclaimer. These are the specific things the build does not do yet, so you can decide whether it belongs anywhere near the files you care about.

  1. 01There is no undo

    A move is a move and a rename is a rename. Nothing here reverses them. This is the single best reason to keep the beta away from the one copy of anything.

  2. 02Hidden files are not shown

    Dotfiles are omitted from every view. There is no toggle yet.

  3. 03Search filters, it does not search

    The toolbar field narrows the folder you are in by name. It does not descend into subfolders and it does not look inside files.

  4. 04Folders do not refresh themselves

    A change made by another app appears after ⌘R, not on its own.

  5. 05Claude and Codex are yours, not ours

    The dock runs the CLIs already installed on your Mac, under your own account and quota. Finder++ bundles neither and carries no account of its own.

  6. 06It does not replace Finder

    It is an app you open. It does not take over double-clicks, the Desktop, or anything else the system hands to Finder.

  7. 07Cross-volume moves are not resumable

    They use the system move operation. A failure part-way through is a failure, not a transfer you can pick up again.

Tell us what broke.

A beta is worth running only if what it does wrong gets back to the person who can fix it. The contribution page has a form for exactly this — pick Test report, and say which macOS version, which Mac, the steps you took, and what happened instead. A reproduction is worth more than a description, because it is the half that is hard.

Send a test report See what else is open

Try it on a folder
you have backed up.

Go to the beta download